3. Accounting Standards Update

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740) Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires (i) a tabular tax rate reconciliation using specified categories and presenting both percentages and amounts, and (ii) disclosure of income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction if the amount is above a specified threshold. The adoption of this update did not have an effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows (see Note 13. Income Taxes).

Accounting Pronouncements Issued and Not Yet Adopted:

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40) Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires additional disclosure of the nature of expenses included in the income statement as well as disclosures about specific types of expenses included in the expense captions within the income statement. In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-01, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40) Clarifying the Effective Date. The amendments in this update may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively, and are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is evaluating the impact that this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05, Financial Instruments Credit Losses (Topic 326), which aims to simplify the measurement of credit losses for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions under Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This amendment introduces a practical expedient allowing entities to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date remain unchanged for the asset's remaining life when estimating expected credit losses. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company has evaluated the impact of the new standard and determined that the adoption will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company will adopt this practical expedient in 2026.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40), to modernize accounting for software costs by removing outdated guidance and better reflect current development practices. The amendment removes all references to prescriptive and sequential software development stages (e.g., preliminary, application development, post-implementation) and allows for capitalization of software costs once management approves funding and completion is likely. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact the standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 25, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 24, 2025
2023Feb 23, 2024
2022Feb 27, 2023
2021Mar 1, 2022
2020Mar 1, 2021
2019Mar 2, 2020
2018Mar 1, 2019
2017Mar 1, 2018
2016Mar 1, 2017
2015Feb 29, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.