Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The amendments in this update require enhanced income tax disclosures, particularly related to a reporting entity's effective tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. For the rate reconciliation table, the update requires additional categories of information about federal, state, and foreign taxes and details about significant reconciling items, subject to a quantitative threshold. Income taxes paid must be similarly disaggregated by federal, state, and foreign based on a quantitative threshold. The Registrants adopted the ASU effective January 1, 2025 using the retrospective approach, with no impact on the Registrants' financial position or results of operations. Additional required disclosures have been included in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Income Taxes."
Recently Issued Pronouncements
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, as amended. The amendments in this update require disaggregated disclosure of income statement expense captions into specified categories in disclosures within the footnotes to the financial statements. The ASU is effective for the Registrants for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and for interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The guidance may be applied on a prospective or retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Registrants will apply the guidance upon the effective date.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which provides a practical expedient related to the estimation of expected credit losses for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under ASC 606. The ASU is effective for the Registrants for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2025. The guidance should be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of this standard on their Consolidated Financial Statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. The amendments in this update modernize the accounting guidance for the costs to develop software for internal use. The amendments remove all references to a sequential software development method (referred to as "project stages") throughout ASC 350-40 and clarifies the threshold entities should apply to begin capitalizing eligible costs. The ASU is effective for the Registrants for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The guidance may be applied on a prospective, retrospective, or modified transition basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Registrants are currently assessing the impact of this standard on their Consolidated Financial Statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 17, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 13, 2025
2023Feb 8, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Feb 10, 2022
2020Feb 19, 2021
2019Feb 5, 2020
2018Feb 7, 2019
2017Feb 16, 2018
2016Feb 9, 2017
2015Feb 10, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.