Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

 

In December 2023, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2023-09, “Income Taxes (740) “Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures”, which requires the annual financial statements to include consistent categories and great disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. ASU 2023-09 is effective for the Company’s annual reporting beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted, and should be applied on a prospective basis, with a retrospective option. The Company recently adopted this ASU retrospectively for the year ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 and it impacts only our disclosures with no impacts to our financial condition and results of operations.

 

In November 2023, FASB issued ASU 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280)”, which is intended to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The amendments require disclosure of significant segment expenses regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (CODM) as well as other segment items, extended certain annual disclosures to interim periods, clarify the applicability to single reportable segment entities, permit more than one measure of profit or loss to be reported under certain conditions, and require disclosure of the title and position of the CODM. The effective date for public entities is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023 and interim periods with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted ASU for the year ended June 30, 2025 and it impacts only our disclosures with no impacts to our financial condition and results of operations.

 

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures” (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses”. This ASU requires disaggregation of certain income statement expense captions into specified categories to be disclosed within the notes to the financial statements, but does not change the expense captions on the income statement. The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively, although retrospective application is permitted, and is effective for annual financial statements starting in fiscal 2028 and interim periods starting in fiscal 2029, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of ASU 2024-03 will have on our disclosures.

 

FASB, the Emerging Issues Task Force and the SEC have issued certain other accounting standards, updates, and regulations as of June 30, 2025 that will become effective in subsequent periods; however, management does not believe that any of those updates would have significantly affected the Company’s financial accounting measures or disclosures had they been in effect during 2025 or 2024, and it does not believe that any of those standards will have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements at the time they become effective.

 

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Sep 22, 2025Showing above
2024Sep 27, 2024
2023Sep 28, 2023
2022Sep 28, 2022
2021Oct 13, 2021
2020Oct 1, 2020
2019Sep 30, 2019
2018Sep 21, 2018
2017Sep 27, 2017
2016Sep 28, 2016
2015Sep 29, 2015

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.