Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”), which requires entities to make incremental income tax disclosures on an annual basis. The amendments require that public business entities disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items meeting a quantitative threshold. The amendments also require disclosure of income taxes paid to be disaggregated by jurisdiction, and the disclosure of income tax expense disaggregated by federal, state, and foreign. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 on January 1, 2025, on a prospective basis (see Note 16). The adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-03, Business Combinations (Topic 805) and Consolidation (Topic 810)—Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity (“ASU 2025-03”), which revises current guidance for determining the accounting acquirer for a transaction effected primarily by exchanging equity interests in which the legal acquiree is a variable interest entity that meets the definition of a business. The amendments require that an entity consider the same factors that are currently required for determining which entity is the accounting acquirer in other acquisition transactions. The Company early adopted ASU 2025-03 on April 1, 2025 on a prospective basis. Legacy Kodiak was determined to be the accounting acquirer (legal acquiree), and AACT was determined to be the accounting acquiree (legal acquirer).
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (“ASU 2024-03”), which requires entities to provide disaggregated disclosures of certain expense captions presented on the face of the income statement into specific categories within the footnotes to the financial statements to provide enhanced transparency into the nature and function of expenses. ASU 2024-03 is effective for the Company’s annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2024-03 may be applied retrospectively or prospectively. The Company is evaluating adoption timing and the impact ASU 2024-03 will have on its financial statements and related disclosures.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-12, Codification Improvements (“ASU 2025-12”), which addresses a broad range of topics to clarify, correct errors, and make minor improvements to the Codification, including a clarification that potential common shares must be included in the diluted earnings per share computation if the combined effect of numerator and denominator adjustments is dilutive, even if a loss from continuing operations exists. ASU 2025-12 is effective for the Company’s annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted on an issue-by-issue basis. While the amendments for earnings per share must be applied retrospectively, other improvements may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is evaluating the adoption timing and the impact ASU 2025-12 will have on its financial statements and related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 11, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 12, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.