The following table provides a description of a recently issued accounting pronouncement that has not yet been adopted as of December 31, 2025. Accounting pronouncements not listed below were assessed and determined to not have a material impact to the consolidated financial statements.

Standard
Description
Effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements
ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40)
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, which enhances income statement disclosures. This requires public business entities to provide a tabular disclosure of relevant expense captions disaggregated into categories such as purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization, and amounts that are already required to be disclosed under current GAAP, a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in the relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated and the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual periods, an entity's definition of selling expenses.

The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The standard should be applied on a prospective basis, and retrospective application is permitted.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact on the financial statement disclosures.

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.