Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
ASU No. 2024-03
In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). The standard requires further disaggregation of relevant expense captions in a separate note to the financial statements. The standard is effective for AbbVie starting in annual periods in 2027 and interim periods beginning in 2028, with early adoption permitted. AbbVie is currently assessing the impact of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
ASU No. 2023-09
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740). The standard requires disaggregation of the effective tax rate reconciliation into standard categories, enhances disclosure of income taxes paid, and modifies other income tax-related disclosures. AbbVie adopted the standard in the fourth quarter of 2025 on a prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 14 for additional information.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 20, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 14, 2025
2023Feb 20, 2024
2021Feb 18, 2022
2020Feb 19, 2021
2019Feb 21, 2020
2018Feb 27, 2019
2017Feb 16, 2018
2016Feb 17, 2017
2015Feb 19, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.