SIGNIFICANT RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

In fiscal year 2025, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. This ASU requires public entities to disclose significant segment expense categories that are regularly provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) and included in the measure of segment profit or loss.

 

The Company operates as a single reportable segment. The adoption of ASU 2023-07 did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements but resulted in enhanced footnote disclosures regarding significant segment expenses, as reflected in Note 9 – Segment Reporting.

 

In March 2024, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (“ASU 2024-03”), which requires public business entities to provide enhanced annual and interim disclosures that disaggregate specified income statement expense categories. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is evaluating whether the adoption of this new standard will have a material impact on our disclosures.

 

In March 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2024-02, Codification Improvements—Amendments to Remove References to the Concepts Statements (“ASU 2024-02”). ASU 2024-02 eliminates various references to the FASB’s Concepts Statements from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification in order to clarify that the Codification represents the authoritative source of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. The amendments do not alter existing accounting requirements. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, including interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2024, and early adoption is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

 

In December 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”), which requires enhanced annual disclosures for specific categories in the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes. ASU 2023-09 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company is evaluating if the adoption of this new standard will have a material effect on our disclosures.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 for smaller reporting companies that did not previously early adopt was January 1, 2023. The Company maintained US Treasury bills with maturities of less than three months and expects zero credit losses from these securities. As a result, the Company did not record an allowance for expected credit losses.

 

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Jun 26, 2025Showing above
2024Jun 27, 2024
2023Jun 28, 2023
2022Jun 28, 2022
2021Jun 24, 2021
2020Jun 25, 2020
2019Jul 1, 2019
2018Jun 8, 2018
2017Jun 28, 2017
2016Jun 29, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.