Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

The Company considers the applicability and impact of all Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) issued by the FASB. Recently issued ASUs not listed below either were assessed and determined to be not applicable or are currently expected to have no impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

 

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement Reporting Comprehensive Income Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. This ASU requires more detailed disclosures related to certain costs and expenses. The guidance requires entities to disclose amounts of certain expense categories included in expense captions presented on the face of the income statement, including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The disclosure requirements may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. Management is currently evaluating this ASU to determine its impact on the Company’s disclosures.

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

 

Effective January 1, 2025, the Company adopted ASU 2023-08, Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets, which requires certain crypto assets that meet the scope criteria of ASC 350-60 to be measured at fair value, with changes recognized in net income each reporting period. Upon adoption, the Company began presenting in-scope digital assets separately from other intangible assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognizing unrealized gains and losses from remeasurement within “Gains (losses) on digital assets” in the Consolidated Statements of Net Loss. The Company also provides enhanced disclosures regarding the nature and amount of digital assets held, including the name of each significant digital asset, units held, cost basis, fair value, and the fair value of any digital assets subject to contractual sale restrictions. The adoption of ASU 2023-08 did not result in a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings due to the commencement of the Company’s ATH Treasury Strategy in September 2025.

 

Effective January 1, 2025, the Company adopted ASU 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires expanded disaggregation of income tax information to enhance transparency and comparability. As a result, the Company now presents a more detailed reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate, including separate disclosure of state and local income taxes, foreign tax effects, tax credits, valuation allowance changes, nondeductible items, and changes in unrecognized tax benefits. The Company also discloses income taxes paid (net of refunds) disaggregated by federal, state, and significant foreign jurisdictions, including any individual jurisdiction that represents 5% or more of total income taxes paid. In addition, the Company now presents pretax income (loss) and income tax expense (benefit) disaggregated between domestic and foreign operations, with separate disclosure for any significant individual foreign jurisdictions. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 on a retrospective basis.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 31, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 31, 2025
2023Mar 28, 2024
2022Mar 21, 2023
2021Mar 31, 2022
2020Mar 15, 2021
2019Apr 1, 2020
2018Apr 1, 2019
2017Apr 2, 2018
2016Mar 15, 2017
2015Mar 16, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.