Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards:

Income Taxes

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09 as an update to ASC Topic 740, which will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2023-09 enhances the disclosures surrounding income taxes, specifically in relation to the rate reconciliation table and income taxes paid. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 effective for the year ended December 31, 2025, however the impact was immaterial due to the decreased activity of the general contracting and real estate services business operated through the Company's TRS.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted:

Recent accounting pronouncements, other than those below, issued by the FASB did not or are not believed by management to have a material effect on the Company’s present or future financial statements or disclosures.

Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03 as an update to ASC Topic 220-40, which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2024-03 was issued to improve the disclosures about a public business entity's expenses and address request from investors for more detailed information about the types of expenses (including employee compensation, depreciation, and amortization) in commonly presented expense captions (such as general and administrative expenses). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2024-03 on its consolidated financial statements.

Credit Losses

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑05 as an update to ASC Topic 326, which will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2025, including interim periods. Early adoption is permitted. The amendment allows for a practical expedient when estimating expected credit losses and is intended to refine and enhance the application of CECL by providing clarifications related to expected credit loss measurement, model inputs, and disclosure requirements. The Company does not expect ASU 2025-05 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Derivatives and Hedging

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑09, as an update to ASC Topic 815, which will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2026, including interim periods. Early adoption is permitted and the guidance is applied prospectively, with transition provisions for updating certain existing hedging relationships. The amendments clarify and refine aspects of hedge accounting, including (i) assessing similar risk exposure for groups of forecasted transactions in cash flow hedges, (ii) hedging forecasted interest payments on choose‑your‑rate debt instruments, (iii) cash flow hedges of nonfinancial forecasted transactions (including component hedging), (iv) the use
of net written options as hedging instruments, and (v) certain foreign‑currency hedge accounting matters. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025‑09 on its consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Feb 29, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Feb 24, 2022
2020Feb 24, 2021
2019Feb 25, 2020
2018Feb 28, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Mar 1, 2017
2015Mar 2, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.