Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2025-05 Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets (“ASU 2025-05”). ASU 2025-05 provides a practical expedient that can be elected to be applied to accounts receivable and contract assets, which would allow entities to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the assets when estimating expected credit losses for such assets. ASU 2025-05 is effective for annual reporting periods that began after December 15, 2025 and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2025-05 is currently being evaluated by the Company, but it is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s position or operations.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”). ASU 2024-03 requires additional disclosures of the nature of expenses included in the Company’s income statement. The new standard requires disclosures about specific types of expenses included in the expense captions presented on the face of the income statement as well as disclosures about selling expenses. ASU 2024-03 will be applied prospectively with the option for retrospective application. The FASB subsequently issued ASU 2025-01 Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40) to clarify that all public business entities are required to adopt the guidance as stipulated in ASU 2024-03 in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). ASU 2023-09 requires entities to provide additional information of the Company’s tax rate reconciliation, as well as additional disclosures about income taxes paid by jurisdiction. ASU 2023-09 became effective for annual reporting periods that began after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2023-09 should be applied prospectively, but entities have the option to apply it retrospectively for each period presented. In fiscal year 2026, the Company adopted ASU 2023-09, which requires enhanced disaggregation of income taxes paid and the effective tax rate reconciliation. The Company adopted this guidance on a prospective basis; accordingly, the newly required disaggregated disclosures are provided for the current period, while prior period disclosures have not been retroactively adjusted and continue to be presented under the previous disclosure requirements, as permitted by ASU 2023-09.

All other recent accounting pronouncements were determined to not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026May 21, 2026Showing above
2025May 22, 2025
2024May 23, 2024
2023May 25, 2023
2022May 18, 2022
2021May 19, 2021

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.