New Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standard-setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations upon adoption.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (“Topic 740”): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures in order to provide information to assist key stakeholders in better assessing how the Company’s operations and related tax risks and tax planning and operational opportunities affect the Company’s tax rate and prospects for future cash flows. This ASU became effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. This guidance was applied on a retrospective basis. See Note 17, Income Taxes in these “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in this Annual Report for additional information.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures, to improve disclosures about a public business entity’s expenses and address requests from investors for more detailed information about the types of expenses (including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, amortization and depletion) in commonly-presented expense captions, such as cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses, and research and development. All disclosure requirements under this guidance are required for public business entities and effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted and the amendments in this guidance will be applied prospectively to financial statements for periods after the effective dates. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. This ASU updates the requirements for capitalization of internal-use software, removing all reference to prescriptive and sequential software development stages (referred to as “project stages”). This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting. The amendments in this update clarify current interim disclosure requirements and provide a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures. The update also incorporates a disclosure principle that requires entities to disclose events that occur after the end of the reporting period. This update is effective for interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, though early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact this ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 25, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 12, 2025
2023Feb 21, 2024
2022Feb 16, 2023
2021Feb 16, 2022
2020Feb 11, 2021
2019Feb 13, 2020
2018Feb 15, 2019
2017Feb 16, 2018
2016Feb 17, 2017
2015Feb 25, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.