Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures ("ASU 2023-09"), which improves income tax disclosures by requiring (1) consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and (2) income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. It also includes certain other amendments to improve the effectiveness of income tax disclosures. The Company retrospectively adopted ASU 2023-09, effective December 31, 2025, and the adoption resulted in additional disclosures in the Income Taxes footnote.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Hedge Accounting Improvements (“ASU 2025-09”). The amendments in this update aim to better align financial reporting with an entity's risk management strategies. It makes improvements in five key areas to help entities achieve and maintain hedge accounting for highly effective economic hedges. Improvements include changes to similar risk assessment for cash flow hedges, a new model for Choose-Your-Rate debt instruments, a principles-based approach for nonfinancial forecasted transactions, clarification on net written options, and addressing the mismatch in dual-hedge accounting ASU 2025-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company has not determined the impact ASU 2025-09 may have on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software (ASU 2025-06) updating guidance on accounting for internal-use software. The amendments modernize guidance to consider different methods of software development, updating the requirements for capitalization of software costs. ASU 2025-06 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Prospective, modified prospective, or retrospective application is allowed and early adoption is permitted. The Company has not determined the impact ASU 2025-06 may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires additional disclosures about significant expenses included in certain expense captions presented on the face of the income statement. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Prospective or retrospective application is allowed and early adoption is permitted. The Company has not determined the impact ASU 2024-03 may have on the Company’s financial statement disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 17, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 20, 2025
2023Feb 22, 2024
2022Feb 21, 2023
2021Feb 22, 2022
2020Feb 18, 2021
2019Feb 20, 2020
2018Feb 21, 2019
2017Feb 22, 2018
2016Feb 23, 2017
2015Feb 25, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.