Recently Adopted Accounting Standards and Developments
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Effective for the financial year ended December 31, 2024 and for interim periods beginning January 1, 2025, the Company
adopted Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2023-07, Segment Reporting: Improvements to Reportable Segment
Disclosures.  Effective January 1, 2025, the Company adopted ASU 2024-01, Compensation — Stock Compensation: Scope
Application of Profits Interest and Similar Awards.  Effective for the financial year ended December 31, 2025, the Company
adopted ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, using a retrospective method,
which requires greater disaggregation of income tax disclosures related to the income tax rate reconciliation and income taxes
paid.  The adoption of these standards did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Developments
In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement —
Reporting Comprehensive Income — Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income
Statement Expenses, which requires improved disclosure of the nature and disaggregation of income statement expenses.  The
standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods beginning after December 15,
2027.  The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that this standard may have on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-03, Business Combinations (Topic 805) and Consolidation (Topic 810):
Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity, which revises guidance on how an entity
should identify the accounting acquirer in a business combination in which the legal acquiree is a VIE.  The standard is
effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within those annual reporting periods.  The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that this standard may have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other — Internal-Use Software
(Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which increases the operability of the
recognition guidance considering different methods of software development.  The standard is effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2027 and interim periods within those annual reporting periods.  The Company is currently
evaluating the potential impact that this standard may have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting
Improvements, which amends certain aspects of the hedge accounting guidance to more closely align hedge accounting with the
economics of an entity’s risk management activities.  The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2026 and interim periods within those annual reporting periods.  The Company is currently evaluating the
potential impact that this standard may have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 17, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 14, 2025
2023Feb 16, 2024
2022Feb 17, 2023
2021Feb 18, 2022
2020Feb 19, 2021
2019Feb 28, 2020
2018Feb 22, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Feb 24, 2017
2015Feb 25, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.