Recent accounting pronouncements
In September 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2025-06, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other — Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software,” which removes all references to software development project stages so that the guidance is neutral to different software development methods. The amendment eliminates the project stage model and clarifies that capitalization of internal-use software costs commences when management has authorized and committed funding for the project and it is probable that software will be completed and used to perform the function intended. The Company is required to adopt the guidance for the year ending December 31, 2028. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses”, which requires disclosure of additional information and disaggregation of certain expenses included in the income statement. The Company is required to adopt the guidance for the year ending December 31, 2027. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 20, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 25, 2025
2023Feb 22, 2024
2022Feb 27, 2023
2021Feb 22, 2022
2020Feb 23, 2021
2019Feb 18, 2020
2018Feb 20, 2019
2017Feb 21, 2018
2016Feb 21, 2017
2015Feb 25, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.