Aprea Therapeutics, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Recently issued accounting pronouncements—From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies that the Company adopts as of the specified effective date.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures: Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses,” which requires disclosure of disaggregated information about specific categories underlying certain income statement expense line items in the footnotes to the financial statements for both annual and interim periods. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard.
In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10, “Government Grants (Topic 832),” which establishes a new Topic 832, Government Grants, and provides comprehensive recognition, measurement, and disclosure guidance for government assistance arrangements. The ASU requires entities to recognize government grants when the grant agreement is legally enforceable and all eligibility requirements have been met, and to present grant income separately from revenue. The guidance also introduces expanded qualitative and quantitative disclosures related to the nature, terms, and financial statement effects of government grants. ASU 2025-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard.
In February 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, “Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements,” which amends Topic 270 to enhance interim reporting requirements. The amendments require additional disaggregation of certain expense categories, expanded interim disclosures for significant events or transactions, and alignment of certain interim disclosure requirements with annual reporting requirements. ASU 2025-11 is effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and for fiscal years beginning after the same date. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this standard.
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements—In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, “Income Taxes (ASC 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures”, which requires disaggregated information about a reporting
entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. ASU 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted this standard prospectively on January 1, 2025, which expanded the Company’s disclosures beginning with its annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2025, but did not have an impact on the consolidated financial results.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 16, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 25, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 26, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 30, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 15, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 16, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 27, 2020 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.