Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Commitments Disclosure
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
The Company leases office and research and development space under a non-cancelable operating lease in Marina del Rey, CA, with the lease term through December 31, 2031. Annual base rent is from $1.9 million and increases by 3% annually and will be $2.5 million by the end of the term. The Company also maintains an irrevocable letter of credit in connection with this lease, which had a balance of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2025 and is reducing 20% annually through the end of the lease term.
On October 28, 2021, the Company entered into a lease for office and research and development space under a non-cancellable lease in Los Angeles, California (the “2021 Lease”). The 2021 Lease payment start date was May 1, 2022 and the total lease term is for 16 years and runs through 2038. Monthly rent for 2022 and 2023 was fully or partially abated while the lessor and the Company completed planned tenant improvements to the facility. The Company was responsible for construction costs over the tenant improvement allowance of $7.2 million. The construction was completed as of December 31, 2024, and the Company received the full allowance. Out-of-pocket expenses to be incurred by the Company are considered noncash lease payments, and included in the lease liability and right-of-use asset.
In connection with the execution of the 2021 Lease, the Company delivered an irrevocable standby letter of credit in the amount of $5.0 million to the landlord in 2022.
Future minimum annual lease payments under the Company’s noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2025, are as follows (in thousands):
| Operating | ||
Leases | |||
2026 | $ | 4,863 | |
2027 | 5,452 | ||
2028 | 5,616 | ||
2029 | 5,784 | ||
2030 | 5,958 | ||
Thereafter | 32,037 | ||
Total minimum lease payments | 59,710 | ||
Less: amount representing interest | (28,613) | ||
Present value of operating lease obligations | 31,097 | ||
Less: current portion | (4,564) | ||
Noncurrent operating lease obligations | $ | 26,533 | |
Operating lease expenses were $8.0 million and $8.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Variable costs related to operating lease expenses and taxes, which are recognized as incurred, were $1.5 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
The following table summarizes supplemental cash flow information related to the Company’s operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
2025 | | 2024 | ||||
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | ||||||
Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | 5,147 | $ | 9,010 | ||
The following table summarizes the weighted-average remaining lease term and weighted-average discount rate related to the Company’s operating leases as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:
December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | |||||
Weighted-average remaining lease term, years | 10.83 | 11.74 | ||||
Weighted-average discount rate, % | 14.0 | 13.9 |
Impairment of ROU Asset
During the year ended December 31, 2025, an impairment charge of $5.4 million was recognized related to the Company’s office and research and development space under a non-cancelable operating lease in Marina del Rey, California. The impairment resulted from changes in the anticipated timeline in the Company’s plan to sublease the vacated space. The ROU asset was determined to be not fully recoverable as the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from sublease income were insufficient to recover the ROU asset’s carrying amount. The impairment charge was determined using level 3 inputs measured based on an income approach, with unobservable inputs including the estimates and assumptions for sublease income and a discount rate commensurate with the remaining lease term of 21.6%. There was no impairment of long-lived assets during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company may be involved in disputes, including litigation, relating to claims arising out of operations in the normal course of business. Any of these claims could subject the Company to costly legal expenses and, while management generally believes that there is adequate insurance to cover many different types of liabilities, the Company’s insurance carriers may deny coverage or policy limits may be inadequate to fully satisfy any damage awards or settlements. If this were to happen, the payment of any such awards could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations and financial position. Additionally, any such claims, whether or not successful, could damage the Company’s reputation and business. The Company is currently not a party to any legal proceedings, the adverse outcome of which, in management’s opinion, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on its consolidated results of operations or financial position.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 25, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 21, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 21, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 16, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 17, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 18, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 19, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 25, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 14, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 27, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 30, 2016 | |
About Commitments Disclosures
Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.
Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.