Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2023-09, Income Taxes: Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (Topic 740). This standard enhances disclosures related to income taxes, including the rate reconciliation and information on income taxes paid. See Note 12 to these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued ASU No. 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (Topic 220-40). This standard requires business entities to disclose in a tabular format, on an annual and interim basis, purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization and depletion for each income statement line item that contains those expenses. The guidance is effective for public business entities in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and in interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Entities may apply the guidance prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of this ASU.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 25, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 25, 2025
2023Apr 1, 2024
2022Mar 22, 2023
2021Feb 28, 2022
2020Mar 31, 2021
2019Mar 26, 2020
2018Mar 28, 2019
2017Mar 8, 2018
2016Mar 16, 2017
2015Mar 30, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.