AYTU BIOPHARMA, INC New Standards Disclosure
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options
In August 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40)—Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity, which simplifies the accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models currently required. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The Company adopted the guidance on July 1, 2024, and the adoption of the standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Segment Reporting
In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (“ASU 2023-07”). ASU 2023-07 was issued to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. ASU 2023-07 also requires all annual disclosures currently required by ASC Topic 280, Segment Reporting to be included in interim periods. The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 on June 30, 2025, on a retrospective basis and updated its disclosures to conform to the new segment disclosure requirements. Refer to the Segment Information section within Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional discussion.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”). The amendments in ASU 2024-03 require public business entities to disclose in the notes to the financial statements, among other things, specific information about certain costs and expenses including purchases of inventory; employee compensation; and depreciation, amortization and depletion expenses for each caption on the income statement where such expenses are included. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted, and the amendments may be applied prospectively to reporting periods after the effective date or retrospectively to all periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this guidance and assessing the potential impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
There have been no significant changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies and there is no other accounting guidance has been issued and not yet adopted that is applicable to the Company and that the Company expects would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as of June 30, 2025, and through the filing of this report.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Sep 26, 2024 | |
| 2023 | Oct 12, 2023 | |
| 2022 | Sep 27, 2022 | |
| 2021 | Sep 28, 2021 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.