Interim Reporting: Narrow-Scope Improvements (Subtopic 270-10)

In December 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements. The amendments in this ASU clarify the applicability of Topic 270, enhance the navigability of interim reporting requirements, and consolidate existing interim disclosure guidance. The amendments specify the form and content of interim financial statements, provide a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures, and introduce a disclosure principle requiring entities to disclose events occurring after the most recent annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. The ASU does not change the fundamental nature or scope of interim reporting requirements.

This ASU is effective for all entities for interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The amendments may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to any periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating this ASU but does not expect its adoption to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Derivatives and Hedging: Hedge Accounting Improvements (Subtopic 815-20)

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements. The amendments in this ASU are intended to clarify certain aspects of the guidance on hedge accounting and to address several incremental hedge accounting issues arising from the global reference rate reform initiative. The update clarifies and expands guidance in several areas, including allowing groups of forecasted transactions to be hedged based on “similar” rather than “shared” risk exposure, offering greater flexibility in applying cash flow hedges. Overall, the amendments respond to stakeholder concerns following ASU 2017‑12 and address complexities arising from global reference‑rate reform, ultimately facilitating the achievement and maintenance of hedge accounting for highly effective hedging relationships.

This ASU is effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2026, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted on any date on or after the issuance of this ASU. The Company is currently evaluating this ASU but does not expect its adoption to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Purchased Loans (Topic 310-10):

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-08, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans. The amendments in this ASU are intended to simplify and improve the accounting for acquired loans by expanding the use of the gross‑up approach, previously limited to purchased credit‑deteriorated (PCD) assets, to a new category of purchased seasoned loans, which encompasses certain acquired non‑PCD loans. Under this approach, entities recognize an allowance for expected credit losses at acquisition with a corresponding increase to the asset’s amortized cost basis, eliminating Day‑1 credit loss expense and promoting greater comparability across acquisitions. This change aims to enhance comparability, consistency, and better reflect the economics of acquiring financial assets.

This ASU is effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted in an interim or annual reporting period in which financial statements have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. This ASU will impact loans acquired in future periods following adoption.

Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. The amendments in this ASU are intended to modernize the guidance for accounting software costs that are accounted for under Subtopic 350-40 and remove all references to prescriptive and sequential software development stages. This increases the operability of the cost recognition guidance by considering different methods of software development. The ASU requires that an entity begin capitalizing software costs when both of the following conditions have been met: management has authorized and committed to funding the software project; and it is probable that the project will be completed; and the software will be used to perform the function intended (referred to as the “probable-to-complete recognition threshold”). In addition, this ASU clarifies disclosure requirements for Internal-Use Software.

This ASU is effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period. The amendments may be applied using the prospective method, the modified transition approach, or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating this ASU but does not expect its adoption to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40)

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The amendments in the ASU require public companies to disclose, in the notes to financial statements, specified information about certain costs and expenses at each interim and annual reporting period. Specifically, they will be required to:
Disclose the amounts of (a) purchases of inventory; (b) employee compensation; (c) depreciation; (d) intangible asset amortization; and (e) depreciation, depletion, and amortization recognized as part of oil- and gas-producing activities (or other amounts of depletion expense) included in each relevant expense caption.
Include certain amounts that are already required to be disclosed under GAAP in the same disclosure as the other disaggregation requirements.
Disclose a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively.
Disclose the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses.

This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The amendments should be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 25, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 26, 2025
2023Feb 23, 2024
2022Feb 21, 2023
2021Feb 24, 2022
2020Feb 23, 2021
2019Feb 21, 2020
2018Feb 26, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Feb 27, 2017
2015Feb 29, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.