BullFrog AI Holdings, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2024, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-07, Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (Topic 280). The new standard improves reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker. ASU 2023-07 also clarifies that entities with a single reportable segment are subject to both new and existing reporting requirements under Topic 280. The adoption of this guidance did not result in a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. See the Segment Reporting section within Note 2.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09: Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures that requires entities to disclose additional information about federal, state, and foreign income taxes primarily related to the income tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. The new standard also eliminates certain existing disclosure requirements related to uncertain tax positions and unrecognized deferred tax liabilities. The guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. The guidance does not affect recognition or measurement in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For comparative purposes, the Company elected to present its 2024 income tax disclosures in this new manner, but the adoption of this guidance did not result in a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. See Note 9, Income Taxes.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05 which amends Topic 326. Specifically, the ASU provides a practical expedient whereby an entity can assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date will not change for the remaining life of the asset (e.g., the accounts receivable). This guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 and can be adopted early. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effects of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-07 which, among other things, provides scope clarification for share-based noncash consideration from a customer in a revenue contract. Specifically, the ASU clarifies that share-based payments from customers in exchange for the transfer of goods or services should be accounted for as noncash consideration within the scope of ASC 606 as opposed to as a derivative pursuant to ASC 815 or as an equity security pursuant to ASC 321. This guidance is effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2027 and can be adopted early. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effects of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
The Company does not believe that any other recently issued effective pronouncements, or pronouncements issued but not yet effective, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 19, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 14, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 29, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Apr 25, 2023 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.