bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company continues to monitor new accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and does not believe any accounting pronouncements issued through the date of this Annual Report will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The Company adopted FASB issued ASU No. ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvement to Income Tax Disclosures. The standard requires enhanced annual disclosures, including: (i) disaggregated information in the rate reconciliation, (ii) disaggregation of income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (benefit) between domestic and foreign, (iii) disaggregation of income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations by federal, state, and foreign, and (iv) disaggregated disclosure of income taxes paid by jurisdiction. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 on January 1, 2025 prospectively. The adoption of ASU 2023-09 resulted in expanded income tax disclosures in Note 15. Income Taxes.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 16, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 31, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Apr 1, 2024 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.