GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 
A substantial portion of the Company's intangible assets and goodwill as of December 31, 2025 relates to the acquisitions of OpenTable and Getaroom.

Goodwill

The changes in the balance of goodwill consist of the following: 
 Year Ended December 31,
(In millions)20252024
Balance, beginning of year $2,799 $2,826 
Impairment(180)— 
Foreign currency translation adjustments50 (27)
Balance, end of year (1)
$2,669 $2,799 
(1)    The balance of goodwill as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 is stated net of cumulative impairment charges of $2.2 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively.
Intangible Assets

The Company's intangible assets consist of the following:
 December 31, 2025December 31, 2024 
(In millions)Gross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net Carrying
Amount
Gross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net Carrying
Amount
Amortization Period
Trade names$1,294 $(711)$583 $1,802 $(1,000)$802 
3 - 20 years
Supply and distribution agreements960 (626)334 1,377 (830)547 
3 - 20 years
Other intangible assets327 (326)326 (293)33 
Up to 20 years
Total intangible assets$2,581 $(1,663)$918 $3,505 $(2,123)$1,382 
 
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $204 million, $221 million, and $222 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.

The estimated future annual amortization expense for the Company's intangible assets at December 31, 2025 is as follows:
(In millions)
2026$141 
2027131 
2028130 
2029121 
2030102 
Thereafter293 

Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets

As of September 30, 2025, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test. Except for the KAYAK reporting unit, the fair values of the Company's reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values.

For the KAYAK reporting unit's goodwill, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $180 million for the three months ended September 30, 2025, which is not tax-deductible, resulting in an adjusted carrying value of $203 million at September 30, 2025. In addition, for the KAYAK asset group's intangible assets (trade names and supply and distribution agreements), the Company recognized an impairment charge of $277 million for the three months ended September 30, 2025. The impairments were primarily driven by a reduction in the forecasted cash flows for KAYAK, reflecting its meta-search business being impacted by expected increases in customer acquisition costs. These impairment charges are recorded in "Impairment" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The estimated fair value of KAYAK was determined using a combination of standard valuation techniques, including an income approach (discounted cash flow) and a market approach (applying comparable company multiples). The income approach estimates fair value utilizing long-term growth rates and discount rates applied to the cash flow projections. The discount rate is determined based on the reporting unit's estimated weighted-average cost of capital and adjusted to reflect the risks inherent in its cash flows, which require significant judgments. Changes in the assumptions used for discount rates would result in directionally opposite changes in the fair value. The market approach estimates value using prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving comparable publicly-traded companies, including the use of the EBITDA multiple. A change in the assumption used for the EBITDA multiple would result in a directionally similar change in the fair value.

At September 30, 2025, the fair values of KAYAK's trade names and supply and distribution agreements were $103 million and $76 million, respectively, estimated using an income approach. The key unobservable inputs used for these intangible assets include royalty rates, distributor margins, and supplier attrition rates (in the range of 2% to 5%, as applicable) and the useful lives of the trade names (20 years). Significant changes in any of these inputs in isolation would result in significantly different fair value measurements. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the royalty rate, distributor margin, and expected useful life would result in a directionally similar change in the fair value and a change in the assumption used for the attrition rate would result in a directionally opposite change in the fair value.
The estimation of fair value reflects numerous assumptions that are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including key assumptions regarding expected growth rates and operating margin, as well as other key assumptions with respect to matters outside of the Company's control, such as discount rates and market comparables. It requires significant judgments and estimates and actual results could be materially different than the judgments and estimates used to estimate fair value. Future events and changing market conditions may lead the Company to re-evaluate its current assumptions and may result in a need to recognize an additional goodwill and/or long-lived asset impairment charge that could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 18, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 20, 2025
2023Feb 22, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Feb 23, 2022
2020Feb 24, 2021
2019Feb 26, 2020
2018Feb 27, 2019
2017Feb 27, 2018
2016Feb 27, 2017
2015Feb 17, 2016

About Goodwill & Intangibles Disclosures

Goodwill and intangible asset disclosures reveal the premium paid in acquisitions and how management assesses whether that premium retains its value. Since goodwill is no longer amortized under US GAAP, the annual impairment test is the only mechanism that adjusts carrying values downward — making the assumptions behind that test critically important for investors.

Key signals: a history of goodwill impairments suggests management consistently overpays for acquisitions. Watch the gap between reporting unit fair value and carrying amount — when fair value exceeds carrying amount by less than 10-20%, a small decline in business performance could trigger a write-down. For finite-lived intangibles, examine useful life assumptions across customer relationships, technology, and trade names; aggressive estimates inflate near-term earnings. Compare total intangibles-to-total-assets ratios against peers to assess acquisition dependency. Rising goodwill as a percentage of equity can signal balance sheet fragility.