Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures ("ASU 2023-09"). This update requires that on a annual basis, entities disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. In addition, the update requires that entities disclose additional information about income taxes paid as well as additional disclosures of pretax income and income tax expense, and remove the requirement to disclose certain items that are no longer considered cost beneficial or relevant. We adopted ASU 2023-09 on December 31, 2025, using a retrospective approach for all annual periods presented.
Because we adopted the standard retrospectively, certain prior‑period income tax disclosures for 2024 and 2023 have been revised to conform to the new presentation and disaggregation requirements. These revisions primarily reflect the reclassification of certain reconciling items within the rate reconciliation into the newly prescribed categories and the disaggregation of income taxes paid and income tax expense by jurisdiction. The adoption did not affect previously reported total income tax expense, net income or shareholders’ equity for any period presented.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 18, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 21, 2025
2023Feb 21, 2024
2016Feb 22, 2017
2015Feb 24, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.