Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires companies to disclose disaggregated information related to the effective tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. This guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. We adopted this guidance prospectively as permitted, effective for the year ended December 31, 2025. Accordingly, prior-period amounts have not been recast and continue to be presented in accordance with previously applicable guidance under ASC Topic 740 (see Note 9).

 

In March 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-02, Codification Improvements, which makes targeted improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification by clarifying guidance, correcting unintended application issues, and improving consistency across various topics within GAAP. The amendments in ASU 2024-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025. We are currently reviewing this guidance and its impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires disclosures about specific types of expenses included in expense captions presented on the face of the Consolidated Statement of Operations. This guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026. We are currently reviewing this guidance and its impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In  July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which introduces a practical expedient. The practical expedient gives companies the ability to assume current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset. The amendments in ASU 2025-05 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025. We are currently reviewing this guidance and its impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements, which clarifies certain aspects of interim reporting guidance, including the application of existing recognition and disclosure requirements in interim periods. The amendments are intended to improve the consistency and clarity of interim reporting practices. The amendments in ASU 2025-11 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026. We are currently reviewing this guidance and its impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-12, Codification Improvements, which amends various sections of the Accounting Standards Codification to correct errors, clarify guidance, and make other incremental improvements to GAAP. The amendments address a wide range of topics including earnings per share, beneficial interests, transfers of receivables, treasury stock accounting, and certain disclosure requirements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026. We are currently reviewing this guidance and its impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 30, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 28, 2025
2023Mar 27, 2024
2022Mar 24, 2023
2021Mar 28, 2022
2020Mar 29, 2021
2019Mar 13, 2020
2018Mar 18, 2019
2017Mar 30, 2018
2016Mar 24, 2017
2015Mar 30, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.