Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements—In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”), which expands annual disclosures in an entity’s income tax rate reconciliation table and requires annual disclosures regarding cash taxes paid both in the U.S. (federal and state) and foreign jurisdictions. The amendments to this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted this standard on a prospective basis and it did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted—In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements (“ASU 2025-11”), which is intended to improve the navigability of the guidance in ASC 270 and clarify when it applies. ASU 2025-11 also adds lists to ASC 270 of the interim disclosures required by all other codification topics, and establishes a principle under which an entity must disclose events since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. ASU 2025-11 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is assessing the effect of this update on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 650-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software (“ASU 2025-06”), which modernizes the accounting for internal-use software costs by removing all references to prescriptive and sequential software development stages. Under this guidance, capitalization of eligible costs begins when management has authorized and committed to funding the software project and it is probable the project will be completed and the software will be used for the function intended. ASU 2025-06 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, using a prospective approach, modified transition approach for in-process projects or a retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing the effect of this update on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement— Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”), which improves financial reporting by requiring disclosure of additional information about certain costs and expenses in the notes to the interim and annual financial statements. The amendments in this ASU are applied either prospectively to financial statements issued after the effective date or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. ASU 2024-03 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing the effect of this update on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 13, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 14, 2025
2023Mar 15, 2024
2022Mar 29, 2023
2021Apr 7, 2022

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.