Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740), which expands income tax disclosure requirements, including additional information pertaining to rate reconciliation, income taxes paid and other disclosures. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 for the year ended December 31, 2025, and applied the new disclosure requirements prospectively to the current annual period. Prior period disclosures have not been adjusted to reflect the new disclosure requirements. Adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the financial statements and resulted only in expanded income tax disclosures. For additional information, see Note 14, Income Taxes.

Accounting Standards Updates to Become Effective in Future Periods

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which allows all entities a practical expedient to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the assets. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. Entities that elect the practical expedient should apply the guidance prospectively. The Company adopted ASU 2025-05 on January 1, 2026, and the adoption had no material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures, which requires companies to disclose disaggregated information about any relevant expense caption presented on the face of the income statement within continuing operations in the following required expense categories, as applicable: (1) purchases of inventory, (2) employee compensation, (3) depreciation, (4) intangible asset amortization and (5) depreciation, depletion and amortization recognized as part of oil- and gas-producing activities or other depletion expenses. This update will be effective beginning after December 15, 2026. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of ASU 2024-03 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements, which clarifies interim disclosure requirements and the applicability of Topic 270. This update will be effective beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of ASU 2025-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Also in December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10, Government Grants (Topic 832): Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities, which establishes authoritative guidance on the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of government grants received by business entities. This update will be effective beginning after December 15, 2028, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of ASU 2025-10 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 16, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 26, 2025

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.