Income Taxes
Income taxes paid were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)202520242023
Cash taxes paid, net of refunds
Federal$5,871 $9,750 $6,000 
State
California (1)
1,300 525 — 
Other domestic460 (355)412 
Foreign— — — 
Total tax expense$7,631 $9,920 $6,412 
(1) The amount of income taxes paid during 2023 does not meet the 5% disaggregation threshold.
Pretax income is entirely related to domestic activities. The Company did not have any foreign operations.
The components of the income tax for the Company consisted of the following at December 31:
(dollars in thousands)202520242023
Current tax expense (benefit)
Federal$7,744 $10,486 $(1,365)
State2,055 1,474 40 
Total current tax expense (benefit)9,799 11,960 (1,325)
Deferred tax expense
Federal3,862 50 12,313 
State591 88 1,566 
Total deferred tax expense4,453 138 13,879 
Total tax expense$14,252 $12,098 $12,554 
At December 31, 2025 the current net income tax receivable was $4.9 million, and at December 31, 2024 the net income tax receivable was $7.1 million.
A reconciliation of the income tax expense (benefit) and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to the income before income taxes is as follows for the year ended December 31:
(dollars in thousands)
2025 20242023
Amount Rate Amount Rate AmountRate
Federal income tax at statutory rate$12,861 21.0 %$12,037 21.0 %$11,998 21.0 %
Effect of:
State income taxes, net of federal
   income tax effect (1)
2,091 3.4 1,284 2.2 1,275 2.2 
Nontaxable or nondeductible items
Excess executive compensation1,695 2.8 167 0.3 145 0.3 
Effect of tax-exempt interest income(65)(0.1)(71)(0.1)(77)(0.1)
Bank owned life insurance earnings(108)(0.2)(102)(0.2)(39)(0.1)
Other34 0.1 33 0.1 41 0.1 
Other
Stock-based compensation(2,016)(3.3)(993)(1.7)(728)(1.3)
Other(240)(0.4)(257)(0.5)(61)(0.1)
Total tax (benefit) expense$14,252 23.3 %$12,098 21.1 %$12,554 22.0 %
(1) For the year ended December 31, 2025, state taxes in California made up the majority (greater than 50%) of the tax effect in this category. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, state taxes in California and Georgia made up the majority (greater than 50%) of the tax effect in this category.
The Company did not record or accrue any interest and penalties related to income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 or 2023. The Company and Bank have entered into a tax allocation agreement, which provides that income taxes shall be allocated between the parties on a monthly basis. The intent of this agreement is that each member of the consolidated group will incur no greater tax liability than it would have incurred on a stand-alone basis.
The net deferred tax asset consists of the following temporary differences and carryforward items at December 31:
(dollars in thousands) 2025 2024
Deferred tax assets: 
Allowance for credit losses$41,602  $40,734 
Lease liability1,219  1,245 
Accrued expenses799  582 
Deferred compensation65  76 
Stock based compensation1,132  1,220 
Section 174 costs—  801 
Other2,448  829 
Total deferred tax assets47,265  45,487 
  
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Right of use asset(1,179) (1,203)
Depreciation and amortization(284) (365)
Credit enhancement recovery(43,196) (40,101)
Section 174 costs(3,299) — 
Other(160)(218)
Total deferred tax liabilities(48,118) (41,887)
Net deferred tax (liability) asset$(853) $3,600 
The determination of the amount of deferred income tax assets which are more likely than not to be realized is primarily dependent on projections of future earnings, which are subject to uncertainty and estimates that may change given economic conditions and other factors. The realization of deferred income tax assets is regularly assessed and a valuation allowance is recorded if it is “more likely than not” that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. “More likely than not” is defined as greater than a 50% chance. All available evidence, both positive and negative is considered to determine whether, based on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is needed. Based upon its analysis of available evidence, including recent profitability, management has determined that it is “more likely than not” that the Company’s deferred income tax assets as of December 31, 2025 will be fully realized and therefore no valuation allowance was recorded. CCBX partners reimburse the Bank for credit losses on loans covered by credit enhancements, therefore the credit enhancement recovery deferred tax liability partially offsets the allowance for credit losses deferred tax asset.
At December 31, 2025, the Company had no federal net operating loss carryforwards or tax credit carryforwards. The Company files federal and various state income tax returns. Federal tax returns for the 2022 tax year and later are open for examination. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, at December 31, 2025 was not material. The amount of tax benefits that would impact the effective rate, if recognized, is not expected to be material. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes with respect to unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 27, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 17, 2025
2023Mar 15, 2024
2022Mar 16, 2023
2021Mar 14, 2022
2020Mar 12, 2021
2019Mar 12, 2020
2018Mar 28, 2019

About Income Taxes Disclosures

The income tax disclosure reveals how much a company actually pays in taxes versus what the statutory rate would predict. Analysts focus on the effective tax rate (ETR) reconciliation, which breaks down every item driving the gap between the 21% federal rate and the company's reported ETR — including R&D credits, foreign rate differentials, and state taxes. Deferred tax assets (DTAs) and their valuation allowances signal management's confidence in future profitability: a rising allowance suggests the company doubts it can use accumulated tax benefits. Uncertain tax benefit (UTB) reserves quantify exposure to IRS challenges on aggressive positions.

Key signals to watch: sudden ETR drops without clear operational reasons, large increases in valuation allowances, growing UTB balances, and significant unremitted foreign earnings. Post-TCJA, pay attention to GILTI and BEAT provisions that affect multinational tax structures. Compare the cash taxes paid (from the cash flow statement) against the income tax provision to gauge earnings quality.