Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. Commitments Disclosure
11. Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, the Company is a party to, or otherwise involved in, legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. As of the date of this report, except as described below, the Company is not aware of any proceedings, threatened or pending, against it which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on its business, results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. (“Liberty”) filed suit against us in federal court in Delaware seeking a declaratory judgment that there was no insurance coverage for any settlement, judgment, or defense costs in the class and derivative litigation, that the monies totaling approximately $1 million it paid to the Company in connection with the SEC investigation were not covered by insurance, and for recoupment of the monies already paid. We had retained counsel to defend us which had filed an answer to the complaint denying its material allegations, as well as a counterclaim against Liberty for breach of contract, declaratory judgment, bad faith and violation of the Washington State Consumer Protection Act, alleging among other things that Liberty wrongfully denied the Company’s claims for coverage of the class and derivative litigations, and seeking money damages. Liberty Insurance Underwriters Inc. filed suit against us in federal court in Delaware seeking a declaratory judgment that there was no insurance coverage for any settlement, judgment, or defense costs in the class and derivative litigation, that the monies totaling approximately $1 million it paid to the Company in connection with the SEC investigation were not covered by insurance, and for recoupment of the monies already paid.
On June 7, 2022, the court filed a Stipulation and Order for Entry of Judgment in the amount of $1,359,064 in favor of Liberty (the “Judgment”) following summary judgment granted by the court to Liberty on all but one of the matters at issue in the case. The Company filed an appeal in July 2022.
On March 29, 2023, the Third Circuit ruled in favor of the Company on the appeal, thereby vacating the trial court’s prior grant of summary judgment in favor of Liberty. As a result of this ruling, the case has been remanded to the District Court for trial on the merits of the Company’s coverage claims for defense and settlement costs. The Court had ordered the return of the $1.6 million. On August 8, 2023, the Company received $1.6 million as refunded by the registry of the court. On November 16, 2023, prior to commencement of a new trial which had been scheduled for December 4, 2023, the parties entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which Liberty paid the Company an additional $1 million and each party released the other from its respective claims and rights arising from the matter. There is no further litigation with Liberty following this settlement.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Mar 31, 2025 | Showing above |
| 2023 | Mar 28, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 29, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 23, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 17, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 27, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Apr 1, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 21, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 31, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 15, 2016 | |
About Commitments Disclosures
Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.
Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.