Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, “Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (Topic 740)”. ASU 2023-09 requires enhanced disclosures on income taxes paid, adds disaggregation of continuing operations before income taxes between foreign and domestic earnings and defines specific categories for the reconciliation of jurisdictional tax rate to effective tax rate. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, and can be applied on a prospective basis. The Company adopted this new standard on a prospective basis for fiscal year 2025 and is reflected in Note 13, “Income Taxes”.
Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350 - 40) - Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software.” ASU 2025-06 improves the operability of the guidance by removing all references to software development project stages so that the guidance is neutral to different software development methods, including the methods that entities may use to develop software in the future. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted, and the amendments in this ASU may be adopted using either a prospective transition approach, a modified transition approach or a retrospective transition approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this new standard will have on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivables and Contract Assets.” ASU 2025-05 provides a practical expedient to assume that the current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset if the expected credit losses were estimated under the reasonable and supportable approach. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted, and if practical expedient is elected, the amendments in this update should be applied on a prospective basis. The Company has evaluated the impact this new standard will have and has determined that there will not be a material impact on the consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (Subtopic 220-40)” which requires enhanced disclosure of income statement expense categories to improve transparency and provide financial statement users with more detailed information about the nature, amount and timing of expenses impacting financial performance. This new guidance is effective for the Company for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this ASU may be adopted using the prospective or retrospective methods. The Company is currently evaluating the method of adoption and the impact this new standard will have on the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 18, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 19, 2025
2023Feb 14, 2024
2022Feb 22, 2023
2021Feb 16, 2022
2020Feb 17, 2021
2019Feb 11, 2020
2018Feb 13, 2019
2017Feb 13, 2018
2016Feb 14, 2017
2015Feb 12, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.