20. Impact of recent accounting standards

Adoption of new accounting standards:

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The ASU requires disaggregated information about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as additional information on income taxes paid. The Company adopted the standard as of December 31, 2025, including a recast of 2024 and 2023 information, by including the additional required disclosures within the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The adoption this guidance did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Effect of newly issued but not yet effective accounting standards:

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The ASU requires public companies to disclose, in the notes to financial statements, specific information about certain costs and expenses at each interim and annual reporting period. The amended ASU is effective on a prospective basis for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 16, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 17, 2025
2023Mar 27, 2024
2022Mar 30, 2023
2021Mar 29, 2022
2020Mar 31, 2021
2019Mar 16, 2020
2018Mar 18, 2019
2017Mar 16, 2018
2016Mar 16, 2017
2015Mar 15, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.