Recent Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No 2025-10, Government Grants - (Topic 832): Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities. The amendment establishes the accounting guidance for governmental grants received by a business entity. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2028 and interim reporting periods within the annual reporting period. The amendment may be applied on a modified prospective approach, a modified retrospective approach or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted in both interim and annual reporting periods. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has not elected to early adopt the standard and is evaluating the effect of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. The amendment clarifies when software costs should be capitalized and requires certain disclosures for all capitalized internal-use software costs. This guidance may be applied prospectively, retrospectively or on a modified retrospective basis and is effective for annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company intends to early adopt ASU 2025-06 prospectively, effective January 1, 2026. The adoption is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-07, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Derivatives Scope Refinements and Scope Clarification for Share-Based Noncash Consideration from a Customer in a Revenue Contract. The amendment expands the derivative scope exceptions and clarifies when an entity should apply the guidance in ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, to contracts with share-based noncash consideration from a customer for the transfer of goods or services. This guidance may be applied either prospectively or on a modified retrospective basis and is effective for annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026. The Company intends to early adopt ASU 2025-07 prospectively, effective January 1, 2026. The adoption is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). The amendment requires certain expenses presented on the face of the income statement to be disaggregated in the notes to the financial statements. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The amendments may be applied either prospectively to financial statements issued for reporting periods after the effective date of this ASU or retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has not elected to early adopt the standard and is evaluating the effect of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 24, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 25, 2025
2023Feb 22, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Feb 28, 2022
2020Mar 1, 2021
2019Mar 2, 2020
2018Feb 28, 2019
2017Mar 1, 2018
2016Feb 28, 2017
2015Feb 29, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.