Decoy Therapeutics Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU No. 2024-03”), which requires disaggregated disclosure of certain costs and expenses, including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, amortization and depletion, within relevant income statement captions. ASU No. 2024-03 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027 on a retrospective or prospective basis, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2024-03 will have on its financial statement disclosures.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which allows an entity to elect a practical expedient for measuring expected credit losses on current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for as revenues from contracts customers. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim periods within those fiscal years on a prospective basis. Adoption is expected to have an immaterial effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2025, FASB issued ASU 2025-10, Financial Instruments - Government Grants (Topic 832): Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities, which establishes authoritative guidance on the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of government grants received by business entities. The update provides a framework for determining when a grant should be recognized in income and includes enhanced disclosure requirements. ASU 2025-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Adoption is expected to have an immaterial effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which is intended to improve the transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the effective tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid by jurisdiction. The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted ASU No. 2023-09 prospectively in its fiscal year 2025. Adoption has an immaterial effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 31, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 21, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 22, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 27, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 25, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 18, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 23, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 6, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 7, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 8, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 8, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.