ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLCEMP
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, LLC New Standards Disclosure
New Accounting Pronouncements
The accounting standard-setting process is ongoing, and the FASB is currently working on several projects that have not yet resulted in final pronouncements. Final pronouncements that result from these projects could have a material effect on Entergy’s future results of operations, financial positions, or cash flows.
In March 2024 the SEC issued final rules that require registrants to provide certain climate-related disclosures in annual reports and registration statements in order to enhance and standardize climate-related disclosures for investors. The final rules require a registrant to disclose, among other things: material climate-related risks; activities to mitigate or adapt to such risks; information about the registrant’s board of directors’ oversight of climate-related risks and management’s role in managing material climate-related risks; and information on any climate-related targets or goals that are material to the registrant’s business, results of operations, or financial condition. In addition, the final rules require disclosure of Scope 1 and/or Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions on a phased-in basis by certain larger registrants when those emissions are material; the filing of an attestation report covering the required disclosure of such registrant’s Scope 1 and/or Scope 2 emissions, also on a phased-in basis; and disclosure of the financial statement effects of severe weather events and other natural conditions. The final rules provide that the phase-in compliance period is effective for Entergy beginning with its annual report for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. In April 2024 the SEC stayed the final rules, pending judicial review of consolidated challenges to the rules by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. In February 2025 then Acting SEC Chairman directed the SEC staff to request that the court not schedule the case for argument to provide time for the SEC to deliberate and determine the appropriate next steps in these cases. In March 2025 the SEC voted to end its defense of the final rules against parties that have legally challenged the rules. In April 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ordered the litigation to be held in abeyance and directed the SEC to indicate within 90 days whether the SEC would reconsider or review the climate disclosure rules. In July 2025 the SEC submitted a status report to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit stating that it does not intend to review or reconsider its final rules at this time and requesting that the Court of Appeals terminate the abeyance and proceed with its judicial review of the case. In September 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit paused its consideration of legal challenges against the rules, pending further action by the SEC. Entergy will continue to monitor developments related to the SEC’s final rules on climate-related disclosures.
In November 2024 the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40).” The ASU is intended to improve disclosures around income statement expenses by requiring disaggregated information within the footnotes to the financial statements
about specific expense categories in commonly presented income statement expense captions. ASU 2024-03 is effective for Entergy for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026. Entergy does not expect ASU 2024-03 to materially affect its results of operations, financial positions, or cash flows.
In September 2025 the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software.” The ASU is intended to improve the operability of the guidance around capitalizing development costs incurred for internal-use software by removing all references to software development project stages so that the guidance is neutral to different software development methods. Instead, entities will be required to start capitalizing software costs when management has authorized and committed to funding the project and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software used to perform the function intended. ASU 2025-06 is effective for Entergy for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Entergy does not expect ASU 2025-06 to materially affect its results of operations, financial positions, or cash flows.
In December 2025 the FASB issued ASU 2025-10, “Government Grants (Topic 832): Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities.” The ASU establishes the accounting for a government grant received by a business entity, including guidance for a grant related to an asset and a grant related to income. Currently, in the absence of specific guidance, many business entities look to other guidance within GAAP or in International Accounting Standards to account for government grants. ASU 2025-10 is effective for Entergy for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028. Entergy does not expect ASU 2025-10 to materially affect its results of operations, financial positions, or cash flows.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 19, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 18, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 23, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 24, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Feb 25, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Feb 26, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Feb 21, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Feb 26, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Feb 26, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Feb 24, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Feb 26, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.