Ensysce Biosciences, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which focuses on the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. ASU No. 2023-09 requires public business entities to disclose, on an annual basis, specific categories in the effective tax rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. In addition, ASU No. 2023-09 requires companies to disclose further information about income taxes paid. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, and may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. We adopted the ASU retrospectively for the period ending December 31, 2025, and it affects only our disclosures under Note 11, Income taxes, and does not impact our results of operations or financial condition.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”), which requires disclosure about the types of costs and expenses included in certain expense captions presented on the income statement. The new disclosure requirements are effective for the Company’s annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on our related disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-04, “Debt – Debt with Conversion and other Options (Subtopic 470-20) “, which set forth to improve the relevance and consistency in the application of induced conversion guidance in Subtopic 470-20, Debt— Debt with Conversion and Other Options such as clarifying the requirements for determining whether certain settlements of convertible debt instruments should be accounted for as an induced conversion. ASU 2024-04 is effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10, Government Grants (Topic 832): Accounting for Government Grants by Business Entities, which set forth new amendments that require entities to recognize government grants when it is probable that the grant conditions will be met and the grant will be received, and to provide enhanced disclosures regarding the nature, terms, and financial statement effects of such grants. The new amendments are effective for public companies with annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2028 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 30, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 10, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 15, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 30, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 31, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 15, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 10, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 11, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 9, 2018 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.