Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Income Taxes (Topic 740) - In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, "Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures," which requires enhanced disclosures in the effective tax rate reconciliation and the disclosure of income taxes paid by jurisdiction. The Company adopted the new standard on December 31, 2025. The adoption of the standard did not have a material impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 11, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Income Statement (Topic 220) - In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, "Reporting Comprehensive Income -Expense Disaggregation Disclosures," which requires enhanced disclosures regarding certain expenses in the financial statements. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning in fiscal year 2027 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning in fiscal year 2028. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its disclosures to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 18, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 19, 2025
2023Feb 21, 2024
2022Feb 22, 2023
2017Feb 28, 2018
2016Mar 13, 2017

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.