Recently Adopted Accounting Standards under GAAP
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-09, “Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures,” which requires significant additional disclosures about income taxes, primarily focused on the disclosure of income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction and the rate reconciliation table. The new guidance has been adopted for the year ended December 31, 2025 and has been applied prospectively.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards under GAAP
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses,” which requires public business entities to provide disaggregated disclosures of income statement expenses in the footnotes. This includes detailed breakdowns of expenses such as purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization included in each relevant expense caption. The new guidance will be applied prospectively (with retrospective application permitted) and is effective in the 2027 annual period and in 2028 for interim periods, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the related disclosures.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑09, Hedge Accounting Improvements, which provides targeted enhancements to the hedge accounting guidance in ASC 815. The amendments are intended to improve clarity and operability of hedge designation, effectiveness assessments, and presentation. The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning in 2026, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑11, which updates ASC 270 to clarify its scope and enhance the structure of interim reporting requirements. The amendments include a consolidated listing of required interim disclosures and introduce a principle requiring disclosure of events occurring after year‑end that materially affect the entity. The amendments are effective for interim periods beginning in 2027, with early adoption permitted. We are assessing the effects of this guidance on our interim reporting processes and disclosures.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑12, Codification Improvements, as part of its ongoing project to clarify and correct various areas of U.S. GAAP. The amendments span multiple Topics and include clarifications related to diluted earnings per share, lease receivable disclosures, and transfers of receivables, among others. These changes are not expected to significantly affect current accounting practices. Effective dates vary depending on the underlying Topic. We do not expect this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements, but we will continue to monitor its applicability as the effective dates approach.
We assessed ASUs and disclosure requirements not listed above and determined that they either were not applicable or were not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 19, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 27, 2025
2023Feb 27, 2024
2022Feb 24, 2023
2021Feb 28, 2022
2020Mar 5, 2021
2019Mar 3, 2020
2018Mar 11, 2019
2017Apr 2, 2018
2016Jan 13, 2017

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.