Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, “Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements” ("ASU 2025-11"), which improves the navigability of required interim disclosures and clarifies when that guidance is applicable. Additionally, ASU 2025-11 provides additional guidance on what disclosures should be provided in interim reporting periods. ASU 2025-11 is effective for interim reporting periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this guidance; however, the Company does not expect a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-12, “Codification Improvements” ("ASU 2025-12"), which facilitates codification updates for a broad range of topics arising from technical corrections, unintended application of the codification, clarifications, and other minor improvements. ASU 2025-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this guidance; however, the Company does not expect a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026May 12, 2026Showing above
2025May 13, 2025
2024May 8, 2024
2023May 10, 2023

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.