Commitments and Contingencies
Credit card receivables
In partnership with a credit card issuing bank (the “Issuing Bank”), the Company offers a credit card product to its customers. Under the terms of the program agreement, the Company is required to purchase from the Issuing Bank all credit card receivables originated under the program and offered for sale to the Company. The Company may also be required to repurchase certain receivables in the event of identity theft or other fraud and receivables that become more than 90 days delinquent, subject to the terms of the agreement.

Credit card receivables purchased under this arrangement are recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets upon transfer. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had purchased all credit card receivables of $219.8 million and $65.8 million, respectively, from the Issuing Bank. Certain credit card receivables are pledged as collateral under Company's Ripple Credit Agreement (see Note 15. Funding Debt). As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the carrying value of pledged credit card receivables was $188.8 million and $0, respectively.

The agreement creates an ongoing commitment for the Company to purchase future receivables as they are originated. The amount of future purchases will fluctuate based on customer activity, credit card usage, and credit performance. The Company believes it maintains sufficient liquidity to fund these purchases as they become due.

Legal and regulatory matters

The Company is subject to, and may in the future be involved in, various litigation matters, legal claims, investigations, and regulatory proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company accrues for loss contingencies when management determines that it is both probable that losses have been incurred and that the losses can be reasonably estimable. The Company accrued $1.0 million and $6.1 million in estimated loss contingencies as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, which are included in Accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.

These estimated loss contingencies relate to any unsettled matters in which management has determined that a loss is probable and reasonably estimable. With respect to these matters, management believes losses in excess of amounts accrued, if any, are reasonably possible but cannot be reasonably estimated based on current available information. The Company disputes these claims and intends to defend these matters vigorously.

Earn-Related Litigation

On January 12, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) charged Gemini Trust Company, LLC (“GTC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, for the unregistered offer and sale of securities to retail investors through GTC's facilitation of a program “Earn” that allowed customers to earn interest by lending their crypto assets to a third party partner, Genesis. The SEC’s complaint alleged that the Earn program constituted an offer and sale of securities under applicable law and should have been registered with the SEC. Genesis, which was also named in this complaint, entered into a settlement with the SEC. On April 2, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “SDNY”) ordered a 60-day stay, as requested by the parties, to explore a potential resolution, which stay was later extended until September 15, 2025. On September 12, 2025, the parties notified SDNY that they had reached a resolution in principle and would provide final paperwork for the resolution by December 15, 2025. On December 15, 2025, the parties filed another status report requesting a
continuation of the stay due to the government shutdown, and suggesting that the parties would file paperwork for the resolution by January 26, 2026. See Note 23. Subsequent Events for further details.

Described below are certain matters associated with Earn, totaling $137.0 million in expenses, which GTC has settled as of December 31, 2024. GTC fully accrued for these items as of December 31, 2023 and as a result there was no additional loss recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. There is corresponding activity recorded in the statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2024.

On October 19, 2023, GTC was named as a defendant in a lawsuit brought by the New York Attorney General (“NYAG”) against GTC and various other external parties, including but not limited to Genesis and its parent company Digital Currency Group Inc. (“DCG”), alleging violations and misrepresentations in connection with GTC's Earn program. On June 14, 2024, GTC entered into a settlement agreement with the NYAG that required GTC to distribute approximately $50.0 million (i.e., approximately 3% of in-kind assets) as described below.

On February 28, 2024, GTC entered into a settlement with the NYSDFS (“Consent Order”) that required GTC to contribute $40.0 million to Earn users’ recovery. Additionally, GTC paid a civil monetary penalty of $37.0 million related primarily to the Earn program. GTC paid the $37.0 million of civil monetary penalty to the NYSDFS on March 11, 2024. GTC contributed bitcoin worth $40.0 million, in compliance with the Consent Order, and an additional $10.0 million, in compliance with a settlement agreement associated with the Genesis bankruptcy, towards the Earn users' recovery.

On May 29, 2024, Gemini Earn users received approximately $2.2 billion of their crypto assets in kind, representing approximately 97% of the proceeds of a stipulated settlement reached between the relevant parties. To expedite closure, on June 20, 2024, GTC distributed the remaining approximately 3% of in-kind assets, worth approximately $50.0 million at the time of the settlement, to Earn users. By stepping in to settle the Earn matters, GTC assumed proprietary right of recovery claims of approximately $50.0 million in addition to the $7.5 million general unsecured creditor claim it already had against Genesis. The aggregate of these amounts was determined to have a book value of $29.5 million, all of which was received in 2024.

Commodity Futures Trading Commission Litigation

GTC was the subject of a lawsuit that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) filed in the Southern District of New York on June 2, 2022. GTC and the CFTC settled the matter by means of a consent order that was filed on January 6, 2025. In material part, the consent order states that GTC violated Section 6(c)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act by making certain statements to CFTC staff that GTC reasonably should have known were false or misleading, and GTC also failed to disclose certain facts needed to make its statements not false or misleading. Without admitting or denying liability, GTC agreed to pay a $5.0 million civil monetary penalty, and to be permanently enjoined from making false or misleading statements or omitting to state material facts to the CFTC.

The Company is also subject to other matters for which it is unable to reasonably estimate a possible range of loss, if any. While the outcome of these matters is inherently uncertain and adverse decisions or settlements may occur from time to time, the Company does not currently believe that the ultimate resolution of any such matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. However, the resolution of one or more of these matters could be material to the Company’s operating results for a particular reporting period, and the Company cannot provide assurance regarding their ultimate outcome.

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.