GULF RESOURCES, INC. New Standards Disclosure
(x) New Accounting Pronouncements
Recent accounting pronouncements adopted
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in this Update affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, and any other financial assets that have the contractual right to receive cash. The ASU requires an entity to recognize expected credit losses rather than incurred losses for financial assets. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For the Company which is a smaller reporting company, ASU No. 2019-10 extends the effective dates for two years. The Company had evaluated the effect of the adoption of this standard on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. And the Company had adopted this standard beginning January 1, 2024.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
There were no recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Want the next GULF RESOURCES, INC. new standards disclosure the moment it drops?
Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment GULF RESOURCES, INC.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Apr 11, 2025 | Showing above |
| 2023 | Sep 27, 2024 | |
| 2017 | Mar 16, 2018 | |
| 2015 | Mar 15, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.