(x)      New Accounting Pronouncements

 

Recent accounting pronouncements adopted

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in this Update affect loans, debt securities, trade receivables, and any other financial assets that have the contractual right to receive cash. The ASU requires an entity to recognize expected credit losses rather than incurred losses for financial assets. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For the Company which is a smaller reporting company, ASU No. 2019-10 extends the effective dates for two years. The Company had evaluated the effect of the adoption of this standard on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. And the Company had adopted this standard beginning January 1, 2024.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

 

There were no recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted for the year ended December 31, 2024.

 

 

 

 

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2024Apr 11, 2025Showing above
2023Sep 27, 2024
2022Mar 31, 2023
2021Apr 12, 2022
2020Apr 8, 2021
2019Apr 14, 2020
2018Mar 15, 2019
2017Mar 16, 2018
2016Mar 17, 2017
2015Mar 15, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.