GYRE THERAPEUTICS, INC. New Standards Disclosure
Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted
In December 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (Topic 740). The ASU requires disaggregated information about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as additional information on income taxes paid. The ASU became effective on a prospective basis for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this ASU in its annual consolidated financial statements for the year beginning January 1, 2025. The adoption of this ASU did not have any material impact on the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 13, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 17, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 27, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 30, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 31, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 4, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Feb 20, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 8, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 19, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 8, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 9, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.