Operating Leases
The Company has various operating leases for fulfillment and corporate facilities with lease periods expiring between fiscal years 2026 and 2041, including renewal options the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. The operating lease agreements provide for rental payments on a graduated basis and for options to renew, which could increase future minimum lease payments if exercised. The Company utilizes the reasonably certain threshold criteria in determining which options it will exercise.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company executed new operating leases in New Albany, Ohio; Mesa, Arizona; and Menlo Park, California resulting in additions to operating lease ROU assets of $69.4 million, $20.9 million, $31.5 million, respectively, along with corresponding increases to operating lease liabilities. Additionally, the Company accounted for a lease extension for its existing operating lease in New Albany, Ohio as a lease modification. This resulted in the remeasurement of the lease liability and an adjustment of $10.4 million to the carrying amount of the corresponding ROU asset for the existing facility. During the year ended December 31, 2024, a reassessment was triggered due to signing a lease for a new facility which is in close proximity to and also acts as an operational expansion of an existing facility, as well as investment in leasehold improvements in the existing facility. This resulted in the remeasurement of the lease liability and an adjustment of $0.9 million to the carrying amount of the corresponding ROU asset for the existing facility.

For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Company recorded operating lease costs of $13.5 million, $3.0 million, and $2.4 million, respectively, including variable operating lease costs of $1.1 million, $0.5 million, and $0.4 million, respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, operating cash flows used for operating leases were $1.9 million, $2.4 million, and $1.9 million, respectively. The amount presented for the year ended December 31, 2025 is net of tenant improvement allowance reimbursements received during the period. As of December 31, 2025, the weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate, including for renewal options the Company is reasonably certain to exercise, was 12.3 years and 6.1%, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under the Company's non-cancelable operating lease with an initial lease term in excess of one year subsequent to December 31, 2025 are as follows (in thousands):

2026$12,343 
202716,340 
202816,564 
202917,120 
203017,429 
2031 and thereafter137,178 
Gross lease payments216,974 
Less: imputed interest(68,964)
Present value of net future minimum lease payments$148,010 

The lease payments above do not include $1.5 million of non-cancelable commitments related to a lease that was signed but had not yet commenced as of December 31, 2025.

About Leases Disclosures

Lease disclosures under ASC 842 provide a comprehensive view of a company's leased asset portfolio, including the split between operating and finance leases, discount rates used to present-value future payments, and the maturity schedule of lease obligations. This section reveals a significant source of off-balance-sheet commitments that were largely hidden before the current standard.

Key signals: the weighted-average discount rate affects the size of recorded lease liabilities — a higher rate reduces the reported obligation, so compare the chosen rate against the company's incremental borrowing rate. The operating versus finance lease mix affects both EBITDA and operating income presentation. Watch the maturity table for concentration risk: large payment cliffs in specific years may create cash flow pressure. Variable lease payments excluded from the liability measurement represent real obligations that do not appear on the balance sheet. Compare total lease costs against prior-year operating lease expense to assess the true economic burden.