Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In December 2025, the Corporation adopted ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures retrospectively for all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. ASU 2023-09 enhances transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation, and disaggregation of income taxes paid by jurisdiction. Additionally, the ASU requires disclosure of pretax income (or loss) and income tax (or benefit) disaggregated by domestic and foreign. Finally, the ASU removes the requirement of certain disclosures related to unrecognized tax benefits. The ASU adoption did not have a material impact on the Corporation's financial statements. See "Note 8. Income Taxes."

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026Mar 3, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 25, 2025
2023Feb 27, 2024
2022Mar 1, 2022
2021Mar 2, 2021
2019Feb 25, 2020
2018Feb 26, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Feb 29, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.