HUBBELL INCHUBB
HUBBELL INC New Standards Disclosure
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-04, “Liabilities - Supplier Finance Programs (Subtopic 405-50: Disclosure of Supplier Finance Program Obligations)”, which the Company adopted in the first quarter of 2023, with the exception of the rollforward information, which was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2024.
Payment Services Arrangements
The Company has ongoing agreements with financial institutions to facilitate the processing of vendor payables (“Payment Services Arrangement”). Under these agreements, the Company pays the financial institution the stated amount of confirmed invoices from participating suppliers on their original maturity date. The terms of the vendor payables are not affected by vendors participating in these agreements. As a result, the amounts owed are presented as in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, of which $95.5 million and $101.9 million was outstanding at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. Either party may terminate the agreements with 30 days written notice. Cash flows under the program are reported in operating activities in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, “Segment Reporting-Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures”, which adds a requirement for public entities to disclose its significant segment expense categories and amounts for each reportable segment for all periods presented. This information is required to be disclosed at both interim and annual periods. In addition, this ASU requires a public entity to disclose the title and position of the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in the consolidated financial statements. Public entities are also required to disclose how the CODM uses each reported measure of segment profit or loss to assess performance and allocate resources to the segments. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company included the applicable disclosures within Note 20 - Industry Segments and Geographic Area Information.
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, “Income Taxes: Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures”, which enhances the disaggregation of income tax disclosures. The ASU requires public entities on an annual basis to disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold equal to or greater than 5%. Public entities are required to provide an explanation of certain rate reconciling items if not otherwise evident, such as the nature, causes and judgment used to categorize the item. The ASU also requires disclosure of income taxes paid (net of refund received) detailed by federal, state/local and foreign, and amounts paid to individual jurisdictions that are equal or greater than 5% of total income taxes paid. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 and for interim periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025. The Company adopted the ASU on a retrospective basis with the applicable disclosures included within Note 13 - Income Taxes.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03,“Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (DISE),” which requires additional disclosure of the nature of expenses included in the income statement. The standard requires disclosures about specific types of expenses included in the expense captions presented on the face of the income statement as well as disclosures about selling expenses. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The requirements are required to be adopted prospectively with the option for retrospective application. The company is assessing the impact of adopting this standard on its financial statements and disclosures.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, "Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software", which modernizes the accounting for software costs. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is assessing the impact of adopting this standard on its financial statements and disclosures.
In October 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10, "Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities", which establishes the accounting for business entities on the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of government grants. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028, and interim periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2029. The Company is assessing the impact of adopting this standard on its financial statements and disclosures.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 12, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 13, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 8, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 9, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Feb 11, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Feb 11, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Feb 14, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Feb 15, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Feb 15, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Feb 16, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Feb 18, 2016 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.