LEASES AND RELATED PARTY LEASES
The Company leases administrative, manufacturing, research and distribution facilities and vehicles through operating lease agreements. The Company has no material finance leases as of December 31, 2025. Many of the Company’s leases include both lease (e.g., fixed payments including rent) and non-lease components (e.g., common-area or other maintenance costs). For vehicles, the Company has elected the practical expedient to group lease and non-lease components. 
Most facility leases include one or more options to renew. The exercise of lease renewal options is typically at the Company’s sole discretion, therefore, the majority of renewals to extend the lease terms are not included in the Right of Use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities as they are not reasonably certain of exercise. The Company regularly evaluates renewal options and when they are reasonably certain of exercise, the renewal period is included in the lease term.
As most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses a collateralized incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the present value of the lease payments.
Total operating lease expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, was $23.9 million and $24.3 million, respectively, which includes $0.3 million, in related party operating lease expense.
Supplemental balance sheet information related to operating leases at December 31, 2025 were as follows:
December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
(In thousands, except lease term and discount rate)
ROU assets$140,568 $144,042 
Current lease liabilities14,019 14,540 
Non-current lease liabilities163,059 166,930 
Total lease liabilities$177,078 $181,470 
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years):
Leased facilities15.7 years16.1 years
Leased vehicles2.7 years2.3 years
Leased equipment2.9 years1.6 years
Weighted average discount rate:
Leased facilities5.4 %5.4 %
Leased vehicles3.2 %2.8 %
Leased equipment6.9 %8.3 %
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases was as follows:
December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
(In thousands)
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$23,153 $24,122 
ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities, net of modifications:
Operating leases$12,138 $3,565 
Future minimum lease payments under operating leases at December 31, 2025 were as follows:
Related PartiesThird PartiesTotal
(In thousands)
2026$296 $18,726 $19,022 
2027296 21,721 22,017 
2028296 18,987 19,283 
2029246 18,635 18,881 
2030— 18,253 18,253 
2031— 17,819 17,819 
Thereafter— 148,843 148,843 
Total minimum lease payments$1,134 $262,984 $264,118 
Less: Imputed interest87,040 
Total lease liabilities177,078 
Less: Current lease liabilities14,019 
Long-term lease liabilities$163,059 
There were no material future minimum lease payments under finance leases at December 31, 2025.
Related Party Leases
The Company leases its manufacturing facility in Plainsboro, New Jersey, from a general partnership that is 50% owned by a principal stockholder of the Company. The term of the current lease agreement is through October 31, 2029 at an annual rate of approximately $0.3 million. The current lease agreement also provides (i) a 5-year renewal option for the Company to extend the lease from November 1, 2029 through October 31, 2034 at the fair market rental rate of the premises, and (ii) another 5-year renewal option to extend the lease from November 1, 2034 through October 31, 2039 at the fair market rental rate of the premises.
Lease Impairment Charge
The Company approved a plan to transition the commercial distribution of PriMatrix® and SurgiMend® from the Boston facility to the Company’s manufacturing facility in Braintree, Massachusetts and permanently cease use of the Boston facility. As a result, in the second quarter of 2024, the Company recorded a $4.6 million impairment charge in the Tissue Technologies reportable segment, as the carrying amounts of the operating lease right-of-use asset and fixed assets related to the Boston facility exceeded their fair values based on the Company’s estimates of future discounted cash flows through the end of the lease term and the end of their remaining useful lives, respectively. The $4.6 million impairment charge was comprised of a $1.7 million impairment of an operating lease right-of-use asset and a $2.9 million write-off of fixed assets, which was recorded as a component of cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 25, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Feb 22, 2023
2021Feb 24, 2022
2020Feb 23, 2021
2019Feb 21, 2020
2018Feb 26, 2019
2017Mar 1, 2018
2016Feb 23, 2017
2015Feb 26, 2016

About Leases Disclosures

Lease disclosures under ASC 842 provide a comprehensive view of a company's leased asset portfolio, including the split between operating and finance leases, discount rates used to present-value future payments, and the maturity schedule of lease obligations. This section reveals a significant source of off-balance-sheet commitments that were largely hidden before the current standard.

Key signals: the weighted-average discount rate affects the size of recorded lease liabilities — a higher rate reduces the reported obligation, so compare the chosen rate against the company's incremental borrowing rate. The operating versus finance lease mix affects both EBITDA and operating income presentation. Watch the maturity table for concentration risk: large payment cliffs in specific years may create cash flow pressure. Variable lease payments excluded from the liability measurement represent real obligations that do not appear on the balance sheet. Compare total lease costs against prior-year operating lease expense to assess the true economic burden.