(11) Commitments

 

Leases

 

The Company leases offices, warehouses and vehicles, substantially all of which are classified as operating leases. The Company currently has no material financing leases. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease assets and obligations are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term.

 

In determining lease asset value, the Company considers fixed or variable payment terms, prepayments, incentives, and options to extend or terminate, depending on the lease. Renewal, termination or purchase options affect the lease term used for determining lease asset value only if the option is reasonably certain to be exercised. The Company generally uses its incremental borrowing rate based on information available at the lease commencement date for the location in which the lease is held in determining the present value of lease payments.

 

As of December 31, 2025, the weighted average remaining lease term was 3.5 years and the weighted average discount rate used to determine the operating lease liability was 3.2%. Rental expense related to operating leases was $7.1 million, $6.5 million, and $5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Operating lease payments included in operating cash flows totaled $7.0 million, $6.1 million, and $5.3 million in 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. Noncash additions to operating lease assets totaled $0.8 million, $2.5 million, and $4.8 million in 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.


Maturities of lease liabilities subsequent to December 31, 2025 are as follows:

 

(In thousands)


2026   $ 6,512  
2027     6,392  
2028     5,727  
2029     3,700  
2030     128  
Thereafter     415  
      22,874  
Less imputed interest (based on 3.2% weighted-average discount rate)     (581 )
    $ 22,293  

License Agreements

 

The Company is party to a number of licenses and other agreements for the use of trademarks and rights in connection with the manufacture and sale of its products expiring at various dates through 2038. In connection with certain of these license agreements, the Company is subject to minimum annual advertising commitments, minimum annual royalties and other commitments as follows:

 

(In thousands)


2026   $ 378,484  
2027     355,078  
2028     338,869  
2029     320,429  
2030     275,121  
Thereafter     1,308,933  
    $ 2,976,914  

 

Future advertising commitments are estimated based on planned future sales for the license terms that were in effect at December 31, 2025, without consideration for potential renewal periods. The above figures do not reflect the fact that our distributors share our advertising obligations. Royalty expense included in selling, general and administrative expenses, aggregated $121.7 million, $117.8 million and $103.8 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and represented 8.2%, 8.1% and 7.9% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 10, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 11, 2025
2023Feb 27, 2024
2022Feb 28, 2023
2021Mar 1, 2022
2020Mar 1, 2021
2019Mar 2, 2020
2018Mar 1, 2019
2017Mar 13, 2018
2016Mar 13, 2017
2015Mar 14, 2016

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.