NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures ("ASU 2023-09") to provide disaggregated income tax disclosures on the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. Further, certain requirements related to uncertain tax positions and unrecognized deferred tax liabilities are eliminated. We adopted ASU 2023-09 on January 1, 2025 on a prospective basis, and there was no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
OTHER AS YET ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses ("ASU 2024-03"), which requires disclosure of additional information about specific expense categories in the notes to financial statements on an annual and interim basis. The amendments in this update should be applied on a prospective basis, with retrospective application permitted. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect ASU 2024-03 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software (“ASU 2025-06”). The ASU primarily updates the accounting for internal-use software by replacing former stage-based rules with a principles-based framework. Costs associated with internal-use software will be capitalized only when management has authorized and committed funding and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 and interim reporting periods therein, with early adoption permitted, and can be applied either prospectively, retrospectively or on a modified prospective basis. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-06 on our consolidated financial statements, but we do not expect it to be material.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements ("ASU 2025-11"), which is intended to update the guidance in Topic 270 by improving navigability of the required interim disclosures, clarifying when that guidance is applicable and adding a principle that requires entities to disclose events since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. The amendments in this update are effective for the interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted, and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. We do not expect ASU 2025-11 to have a material impact on our quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 12, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 14, 2025
2023Feb 22, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Feb 24, 2022
2020Feb 24, 2021
2019Feb 13, 2020
2018Feb 14, 2019
2017Feb 16, 2018
2016Feb 23, 2017
2015Feb 26, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.