s.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Below is a brief description of recent accounting pronouncements that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

 

In December 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2025-12, Codification Improvements, as part of its ongoing project to clarify, correct and improve various topics within the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). The amendments cover 33 specific issues, two of which are particularly relevant to REITs, (i) clarifications on the calculation of diluted earnings per share when a loss from continuing operations exists (Topic 260) and (ii) the exclusion of certain lease receivables from enhanced credit loss disclosures (Topic 310). The standard is effective for the Company for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted on an issue-by-issue basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-12 on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and disclosures.

 

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements. The update is designed to better align hedge accounting with an entity's risk management activities by making targeted improvements to the hedge accounting model. Key amendments include, Similar Risk Assessment, which replaces the “shared risk exposure” requirement for grouping forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge with a “similar risk exposure” requirement, permitting broader aggregation of hedged risks, Choose-Your-Rate Debt which introduces a model for hedging interest payments on variable-rate borrowings where the borrower can change reference rates without automatically triggering hedge de-designation, and Net Written Options which clarifies that certain instruments, such as, interest rate swaps with floors, may qualify as hedging instruments without being subject to the net written option test, provided. The standard is effective for the Company for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance is generally required to be applied on a prospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-09 on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and disclosures.

 

In March 2024, the SEC issued rules on the enhancement and standardization of climate-related disclosures. The rules, require disclosure of material climate-related risks; activities to mitigate or adapt to such risks; governance and management of such risks; and material greenhouse gas emissions from operations owned or controlled and or indirect emissions from purchased energy consumed in operations. Additionally, the rules require disclosure in the notes to the financial statements of the effects of severe weather events and other natural conditions, subject to certain materiality thresholds. The rules were to become effective for the Company starting in the year ended December 31, 2025. While the SEC has voluntarily stayed the rules, the Company is currently evaluating the effect the rules will have on its financial statement disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 17, 2026Showing above
2021Feb 24, 2022
2020Feb 18, 2021
2019Feb 18, 2020
2018Feb 22, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Mar 3, 2017

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.