JUPITER NEUROSCIENCES, INC. New Standards Disclosure
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company has reviewed the FASB issued ASU accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and do not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the Company’s reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of the Company’s financial management.
The Company’s Chief Executive Officer serves as the CODM.
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. ASU 2023-09 enhances income tax disclosures by adding more granular, jurisdiction-specific information, especially for investors and analysts. The amendments in ASU 2023-09 are effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 effective January 1, 2025 on a prospective basis. The Company plans to adopt this update during the year ended December 31, 2026. Beyond the expanded, required disclosures, management does not believe that this will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
All other newly issued accounting pronouncements that are not yet effective have been deemed immaterial or nonapplicable.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Apr 1, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 28, 2025 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.