CS Disco, Inc. Income Taxes Disclosure
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||
Domestic | $ | (43,069) | $ | (56,258) | |||||||
Foreign | 848 | 816 | |||||||||
Loss before income taxes | $ | (42,221) | $ | (55,442) | |||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||
Current | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
State | 71 | 62 | |||||||||
Foreign | 609 | 280 | |||||||||
Total current | 680 | 342 | |||||||||
Deferred | |||||||||||
Federal | 60 | (21) | |||||||||
State | 3 | 11 | |||||||||
Foreign | — | — | |||||||||
Total deferred | 63 | (10) | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 743 | $ | 332 | |||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets | |||||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards | $ | 65,720 | $ | 43,225 | |||||||
Capitalized research and development costs | 5,237 | 22,066 | |||||||||
Deferred expenses | 4,214 | 3,405 | |||||||||
Lease liability | 1,734 | 2,331 | |||||||||
Stock compensation | 1,044 | 1,216 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 3,926 | 4,077 | |||||||||
Total deferred tax assets | $ | 81,875 | $ | 76,320 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities | |||||||||||
Capitalized software development | $ | (1,536) | $ | (1,514) | |||||||
Right-of-use asset | (1,549) | (2,139) | |||||||||
Subsidiary outside basis difference | (116) | (73) | |||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | (3,201) | (3,726) | |||||||||
Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance | 78,674 | 72,594 | |||||||||
Less: valuation allowance | (78,866) | (72,721) | |||||||||
Net deferred tax asset (liability) | $ | (192) | $ | (127) | |||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax at U.S. statutory rate | $ | (8,866) | 21.0 | % | $ | (11,643) | 21.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
Effect of: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| State taxes, net of federal benefits | 375 | (0.9) | (2,109) | 3.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign Tax Effects | 263 | (0.6) | 90 | (0.2) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Changes in Tax Laws or Rates | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Effect of Cross-Border Tax Laws | 316 | (0.7) | 116 | (0.2) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Tax credits | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Change in valuation allowance | 6,036 | (14.3) | 11,314 | (20.4) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Nontaxable or Nondeductible Items | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | 1,965 | (4.7) | 1,972 | (3.6) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Officer's Compensation | 519 | (1.2) | 264 | (0.5) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 21 | — | 415 | (0.7) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other adjustments | 114 | (0.3) | (87) | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision effective rate | $ | 743 | (1.7) | % | $ | 332 | (0.6) | % | |||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||
Federal | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
| State - Texas | 66 | 49 | |||||||||
Foreign | |||||||||||
| Canada | — | — | |||||||||
| India | 425 | 315 | |||||||||
| UK | 139 | 172 | |||||||||
Total cash paid | $ | 630 | $ | 536 | |||||||
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 25, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 20, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 22, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 24, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Feb 25, 2022 | |
About Income Taxes Disclosures
The income tax disclosure reveals how much a company actually pays in taxes versus what the statutory rate would predict. Analysts focus on the effective tax rate (ETR) reconciliation, which breaks down every item driving the gap between the 21% federal rate and the company's reported ETR — including R&D credits, foreign rate differentials, and state taxes. Deferred tax assets (DTAs) and their valuation allowances signal management's confidence in future profitability: a rising allowance suggests the company doubts it can use accumulated tax benefits. Uncertain tax benefit (UTB) reserves quantify exposure to IRS challenges on aggressive positions.
Key signals to watch: sudden ETR drops without clear operational reasons, large increases in valuation allowances, growing UTB balances, and significant unremitted foreign earnings. Post-TCJA, pay attention to GILTI and BEAT provisions that affect multinational tax structures. Compare the cash taxes paid (from the cash flow statement) against the income tax provision to gauge earnings quality.