LanzaTech Global, Inc.LNZA
LanzaTech Global, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”)
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, which requires disaggregated information about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. The standard is intended to help investors better assess how a company’s operations and related tax risks and tax planning and operational opportunities affect the Company’s tax rate and prospects for future cash flows. ASU 2023-09 improves disclosures by requiring (1) consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and (2) income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. It also includes certain other amendments to improve the effectiveness of income tax disclosures. This ASU is effective for public companies with annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this ASU on January 1, 2025, using a prospective approach. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows and resulted only in enhanced income tax disclosures included in this Annual Report.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (“Topic 270”)
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11, which improves the navigability of the required interim disclosures and clarifying when that guidance is applicable. The amendments also provide additional guidance on what disclosures should be provided in interim reporting periods. The amendments add to Topic 270 a principle that requires entities to disclose events since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. This ASU is effective for public companies with annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and for interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2028. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its related disclosures.
ASU 2025-10, Government Grants (“Topic 832”)
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-10, which establish the accounting for a government grant received by a business entity, including guidance for (1) a grant related to an asset and (2) a grant related to income. Among other things, the amendment requires that a government grant received not be recognized until it is probable that the business will comply with the conditions of the grant and will receive the grant, and meet the recognition guidance for a grant. For grants related to income, the new standard requires entities to present the resulting income either within other income or as a reduction of the related expense, consistent with the nature of the grant. This ASU is effective for public companies with annual periods beginning after December 15, 2028, and for interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (“Topic 326”)
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-05, which allows entities to elect a practical expedient that assumes that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset. The standard aims to reduce the time and effort necessary to analyze and estimate credit losses for current accounts receivable and
current contract assets. This ASU is effective for public companies with annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and for interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”)
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, which introduces new disclosure requirements for reporting entities to provide disaggregated information on specific expense categories within relevant income statement captions. The standard aims to enhance transparency by requiring a breakdown of expenses such as purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization, and depletion. Additionally, the ASU mandates that certain gains, losses, and reconciling items that align with existing GAAP disclosures be presented in a tabular format, allowing for a more detailed understanding of a company’s expense structure. The standard also requires narrative disclosure for selling expenses, including a description defined by management. This ASU is effective for public companies with annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Free Sentinel
Track for freeWant the next LanzaTech Global, Inc. new standards disclosure the moment it drops?
Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment LanzaTech Global, Inc.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 31, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Apr 15, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 29, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 29, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 25, 2022 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.